![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My good buddy
eavling, in response to something on a previous thread, dug this up on Laurell K. Hamilton's stance on fanfic.
"Fanfiction does not exist. My understanding, legally, is that to keep my copy right completely intact, I must not allow anyone to use my characters for anything. I know the copy right should be protected as long as they don't try and make money from my world or characters, but I'm cautious by nature. I go with the advice of my lawyer has given on it. So if people are writing fanfic, enjoy yourselves, but don't tell me about it. Ever. And don't try and sell stories or books set in my world, with or without my characters. That's illegal."
Excerpt from text interview by Paula Guran for Metropole
http://www.laurellkhamilton.org/Laurell/LKHBiography.htm#interviews
There are two separate issues in all this: One, using another person's copyrighted characters for your own profit, and two, LKH and fanfic.
One: She's right: it's illegal to violate copyright like that. But that's not what we fanfic writers are doing. That's why all disclaimers on fanfic say that nothing is being gained by the writing of the fanfic, and that others own the characters. An archive that has Buffy fanfic available on the Internet is all right; one that charges you to view the content is not. If you see someone trying to profit from fanfic, raise shit.
Two: There are two aspects at work here. The more personal one for LKH is that she doesn't like to share her characters (which I find interesting, not in a good or bad way, from someone who wrote a Star Trek derivative novel once upon a time). The other is one that all writers share -- can you read fanfic based on your own material? What if you then, consciously or not, incorporate aspects in that story into your own work? Some author was sued over that a while ago, and since then most authors do not read fanfic based on their own stories.
There is no real conflict there, however, with the existence of Anita Blake and Merry Gentry fanfic. If you read those words, one thing stands out to me:
So if people are writing fanfic, enjoy yourselves, but don't tell me about it. Ever.
I can live with that.
~~~
Now, I must turn to two other fandoms, briefly, to show different views on fanfic.
1) Joss Whedon: He and his crew are in favour, from what I can recall, because it generates interest in the fandom and brings people back in. They are right on the ball, as reading and writing fanfic can generate new interest in the series, especially after the series is dead. It certainly gets people buying those $60 DVD sets.
2) JK Rowling is in favour of fanfic (BBC Article here) as well. She’s not in favour of the obscene stuff, which could be the object of another discussion. Frankly, I'm not a fan of the Harry/Voldemort rape fic either, and I sure as hell hope it's labelled as such so those 12-year-olds never find it (Also a parent supervision of the Internet thing, but it’s getting late).
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"Fanfiction does not exist. My understanding, legally, is that to keep my copy right completely intact, I must not allow anyone to use my characters for anything. I know the copy right should be protected as long as they don't try and make money from my world or characters, but I'm cautious by nature. I go with the advice of my lawyer has given on it. So if people are writing fanfic, enjoy yourselves, but don't tell me about it. Ever. And don't try and sell stories or books set in my world, with or without my characters. That's illegal."
Excerpt from text interview by Paula Guran for Metropole
http://www.laurellkhamilton.org/Laurell/LKHBiography.htm#interviews
There are two separate issues in all this: One, using another person's copyrighted characters for your own profit, and two, LKH and fanfic.
One: She's right: it's illegal to violate copyright like that. But that's not what we fanfic writers are doing. That's why all disclaimers on fanfic say that nothing is being gained by the writing of the fanfic, and that others own the characters. An archive that has Buffy fanfic available on the Internet is all right; one that charges you to view the content is not. If you see someone trying to profit from fanfic, raise shit.
Two: There are two aspects at work here. The more personal one for LKH is that she doesn't like to share her characters (which I find interesting, not in a good or bad way, from someone who wrote a Star Trek derivative novel once upon a time). The other is one that all writers share -- can you read fanfic based on your own material? What if you then, consciously or not, incorporate aspects in that story into your own work? Some author was sued over that a while ago, and since then most authors do not read fanfic based on their own stories.
There is no real conflict there, however, with the existence of Anita Blake and Merry Gentry fanfic. If you read those words, one thing stands out to me:
So if people are writing fanfic, enjoy yourselves, but don't tell me about it. Ever.
I can live with that.
Now, I must turn to two other fandoms, briefly, to show different views on fanfic.
1) Joss Whedon: He and his crew are in favour, from what I can recall, because it generates interest in the fandom and brings people back in. They are right on the ball, as reading and writing fanfic can generate new interest in the series, especially after the series is dead. It certainly gets people buying those $60 DVD sets.
2) JK Rowling is in favour of fanfic (BBC Article here) as well. She’s not in favour of the obscene stuff, which could be the object of another discussion. Frankly, I'm not a fan of the Harry/Voldemort rape fic either, and I sure as hell hope it's labelled as such so those 12-year-olds never find it (Also a parent supervision of the Internet thing, but it’s getting late).
Moral of the story:
Hug a fanfic writer, they're doing it out of love
Hug a fanfic writer, they're doing it out of love
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:17 am (UTC)For JKR, the fanficcers are what kept the appetites whetted during the three-year drought between GoF and OoP, and between the two-year period from OoP to HBP.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:28 am (UTC)Also, I'm a little biased here -- AB fanfic is my DOC (drug of choice).
Indeed
Date: 2006-02-23 02:35 pm (UTC)Oh, and mhalachai, consider yourself hugged (I know this might not mean much from a non-registered user, but I thought I'd mention it anyway ;-) ).
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:19 am (UTC)((((hug))))
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:28 am (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:39 am (UTC)Laurell is a pessimist by nature. She says she's Wiccan or Pagan but in truth, her God is Murphy's Law. Some of us are naive enough to believe the worst won't happen to us. She's certain that it will. Twice over. (And Laurell is right to be concerned. Some of her fans, and I use the term loosely, are downright crazy and would slap her with lawsuits for idea infringement in a heartbeat if they could. (Remind me to tell you about a contest wherein I was accused of plaguarizing the contest of idea.)
Joss writes for TV for not books. He doesn't write every episode and frankly, the more fanfic out there, the better the possibility that he will discover a new scriptwriter.
Rowling is a global institution. Much like Tolkien, though I have to suggest that if Tolkien were alive, he wouldn't be crazy about some of the fanfic written with his characters.
Star Trek novels are not copywritten to the author. Star Trek (c) is owned and trademarked by Paramount. It is, essentially, fan fiction sponsored by the studio. But again, the world was created by Gene Roddenberry. The episodes were not. There is, in my mind, a difference between TV/Movie and book.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:49 am (UTC)Tolkien sounds a bit like Laurell. We'll see how things go when I actually get around to writing my LotR/AB crossover :P
The Star Trek thing is still deivative fiction -- if I tried to publish Star Trek fic tomorrow, you'd be sure the studio would be on my ass as much as if I tried to publish HP fiction. The copyright is just held by a different agency. But it's possible I'm missing your point. I'm tired and it's been a long week (and it's only Wednesday!)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:52 am (UTC)You cannot publish Star Trek fic for a profit without the studio's okay. That's correct. For a long time, around when ST:TNG came out, there was a big push for this published "fan fic". Paramount/Pocket Books published some very questionable stuff. I have some of it. I think it was in response to the fanfic that was coming out of conventions.
And I hate to break it to you, but it's only Tuesday.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 05:15 am (UTC)...
Great.
I've also got some of those Star Trek books, read a lot of them. I have four favorites, which really hasn't got much to do with the matter at hand, but meh:
1. Star Trek: Strangers From the Sky -- by Margaret Wander Boranno. It's really a great book.
2. Star Trek: Ishmael (#23) -- by Barbara Hambly. Spock goes back in time. It's putting Spock in 19th Century Seattle, with a whole bunch of OCs, but they are such well developed characters that you just don't care. Everything I read the book, I skip the Enterprise stuff, and just read all about the OC stuff. Read it. It's so good.
3. STNG: Masks (#7) -- by John Nornholt. Hey looks! More OCs! But there's a solid world building going on here.
4. ST:Voyager (#16) Seven of Nine -- by Christie Golden. My fave ST-V character is given solid backstory and a great mystery plot. Very nice.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 11:40 am (UTC)I was surprised that I don't have Strangers from the Sky. I must have read it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 02:40 pm (UTC)Okey-dokey: ((hugs)) :-) Thank you for making life more fun.
I also enjoyed _Strangers from the Sky_ and _Ishmael_ (have you read Hambly's "Free Man of Color" novels? Excellent!) a lot. I didn't so much care for _Masks_; I thought that the sybolism was a little too anvilicious, though it *was* a revelation that our noble Jean-Luc might have a fling with a local. I like John M. Ford's work in general, and enjoyed both of his ST:TOS novels, but particularly _The Final Reflection_, which is about a Klingon saving the Federation ~50 years before TOS. I recommend it highly.
I haven't read the STV novels at all; perhaps I will give #16 a shot.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 03:29 pm (UTC)Thanks for those book names, I'll see if I can track them down.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:40 am (UTC)Very
reassuringuseful post. :)-Sonya
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 05:17 am (UTC)It was only through my introduction to Anita Blake's world in Mhalachai's fanfiction, Inevitable, that I gained any interest in reading and purchasing the Anita Blake books.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 05:59 am (UTC)Fanfiction can maintain interest in long-gone fandoms, and introduce you to new ones. Basically, it's an enabler, an entry-level drug and crack all rolled into one :D.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 11:17 am (UTC)me too!
Date: 2006-02-22 06:26 pm (UTC)Not to be a huge brown noser but.... Inevitable is really good, really really good, as good as any of the books I plunked down $7+ for! That may scare the publishing company, but even if I stopped buying AB books and just read FF they have... well they have a bunch of my money they would not have had were it not for Mhalacha!!
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 04:58 pm (UTC)That said ..
I was just reading a Q&A from Poppy Z. Brite and she has said that she doesn't mind people writing fanfic about her older books but doesn't want to see it for her new stuff. I found that interesting. It's like she's trying to preserve them or something.
Sometimes I wonder why authors are so afraid of fanfic. I can understand them not wanting someone to make money off of their characters but it seems based more in fear that people will want to read the fanfic and not the real thing.
I find it strange that I don't read much AB fic at all. If I do, it's almost always a crossover. I think because there is already so much in the original stories that I don't feel the need to write about 'what could have been' or even read about it. I don't like slashing any of the guy characters because it's too plausible. *G* I know they are already doing stuff behind closed doors and the idea isn't as intriguing to me. Strange huh?
Anyway, thanks for your topic .. enjoyed reading it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 05:38 pm (UTC)Also, it is because of your crossovers that I am looking into reading Harry Potter. So thank you for that.
*hugs*
Thank you for doing it for the love.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-22 07:12 pm (UTC)Will I read it? No. Because I have a hard enough time keeping original thoughts straight in my head without reading someone else's thoughts on my characters/world.
Would I allow any fanfic (crossover or not) using my original work to be archived at TtH? No. Because I'm likely to stumble over it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 12:22 am (UTC)I have to say, fanic and fandom was the only thing that kept me interested in HP while I waited for book six and the fourth movie to come out. And then I stumbbled upon AB fandom (actually, I think it was through Inevitable...I was looking for HP crossovers and found it). Once I finished the books, I realized I'd need something like the HP fandom to keep me interested until Micah came out...and it's worked. I'm psyched for Feb 28th, now. If it wasn't for fanfiction and fandom, I wouldn't even know when Micah was coming out! Or what it was called, for that matter.
I can understand why some writers would be hesitant about fanfic, but really, it's of the good. As long as it's being done for fun and out of love, it shouldn't matter SO much. But meh. To each his own, I suppose. I'm just grateful my fandom has authors who don't mind it so much. =) (and that they have amazing fanfic writers!!)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 04:19 am (UTC)