![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yeah. Remember that comment I made a few days ago about a new chapter of Inevitable? Well, here's the thing. I'm covering a huge libel trial at work, which looks like it might be going on for well over a month, and it's taking up all my energy.
My resolution is thus: I will endeavour to write when I can, but things are being shuffeled around in light of work.
I repeat: I am not stopping writing, but until the trial is over I'm not sure how much time I will have to write.
(don't kill me plzthnx)
My resolution is thus: I will endeavour to write when I can, but things are being shuffeled around in light of work.
I repeat: I am not stopping writing, but until the trial is over I'm not sure how much time I will have to write.
(don't kill me plzthnx)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 01:26 am (UTC)This trial is a libel trial with Tony Robbins (http://www.anthonyrobbins.com) suing the Vancouver Sun and sundy others for libel. It's ... long.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 03:16 am (UTC)We (the media
gossi-pmongerscorps) are not even sure if Tony or his dear wife will testify. The speculation is rife, but his lawyer is not telling.And his lawyer... yeesh. The man's brilliant. I've dealt with him before through work, and there is no one else I'd want as my lawyer if I were sued for libel/suing for libel. It makes for an entertaining time in court.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 03:20 am (UTC)Does it now? Is he making all the other attorneys look bumbling, a la the Michael Jackson case? And there is nothing wrong with
gossipmongersjournalists. My favorites are the ones that write for People mag. :Dno subject
Date: 2005-06-28 04:03 am (UTC)I hope it's more interesting tomorrow. My work today was really not quality copy, I have to admit.
Is he making all the other attorneys look bumbling
Knowing all that I do about Canadian libel law, I have to say yes. It's an odd defence the Sun has up (it's all true!) when the two main sources in the story (the ex-husband and a ex-con buddy) have retracted their comments.
We'll see.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-28 04:32 am (UTC)