My HBP 2cents

[mhalachai]

This post contains HBP spoilers. You have been warned.

Okay, so I know that half of LJ has weighed in, but I haven't seen these points, so I will make them now.

MY intepretation of the book:

I think the reason that Dumbledore trusted Snape so much was an Unbreakable Vow. I think it for this reason: Yes, in the second chapter with Snape, Bella and Narcissa, we get a bit of exposition on the Vow. But then, later, Harry and Ron are talking about an Unbreakable Vow, and Ron gives the exposition that you'll die if you break your vow. This is Hammer-To-The-Forebrain exposition, and I think if JKR only wanted to let us know Snape wouild die if he breaks his vow to Cissa, then Bella could have said something snarky in that chapter.

Dumbledore trusts Snape. Flat out. There has to be a reason. I think the reason was the Vow. Something big, like "I Vow never to betray you or the side of Light" sort of thing.

---

Did anyone else think Tonks was an impersonator in the first part of the book? No metamorphizing, wrong Patronus, zombie-like stare... Yeah, b/c love to a werewolf would do it. Riight.

---

Best exchange of the book, between Snape and Harry:

"Yes," Harry said stiffly.
"Yes, sir."
"There's no need to call me sir, Professor."

---

I'm still not sure what to make of Malfoy in this book. I'll get back to you.


Also, go fill out my HBP poll if you haven't already.

Comments

[ravenfrog.livejournal.com]

I thought Tonks might have been one of those dead inferi things, and that's why she lost her morphing: the flesh was dead. But yeah, it's pretty lame to have her totally lose it (for an entire school year, no less)" because her crush isn't working out.

[mhalachaiswords.livejournal.com]

I hope there was more to it, and we'll learn that next book. But yeah, it was pretty lame.