Yet Another Horcrux Theory
Jan. 9th, 2006 03:49 pmMy monthly HP rambles. (Contains HBP discussion, FYI)
Now, we've all heard them. Harry's a horcrux. His scar is a horcrux. His eyes (the colour of Aveda Kedavra... a coincidence? I think NOT!) are the horcrux.
Well, here's my crazy theory: Voldemort's wand is the horcrux.
See, it all makes sense. That Halloween night at Godric's Hollow, with both Lily's and James's deaths swirling around, Voldie goes in for the final kill (baby!Harry). He raises his wand, magic at the ready... but the magic is pushed back and Voldemort destroyed.
The wand was the only thing between Voldemort and Harry.
So far, JKR hasn't made any indication if a horcrux can be anything other than an inanimate object, but what we've seen (the diary, Gaunt's ring) would make it seem as though the thing must be inanimate. Indeed, Dumbledore theorized that Voldemort was questing to use Hogwarts founder objects, not Hogwarts' students. (That might have been to spare poor Harry the angst, however).
We've seen only inanimate objects as horcruxes (the diary, Gaunt's ring) and it would make sense to think that the thing must be inanimate. (It being risky to turn a living object into a horcrux, as per Dumbledore). So, yeah.
What do you think?
Yes, kids! It's time for Yet Another Horcrux Theory (YAHT).
Now, we've all heard them. Harry's a horcrux. His scar is a horcrux. His eyes (the colour of Aveda Kedavra... a coincidence? I think NOT!) are the horcrux.
Well, here's my crazy theory: Voldemort's wand is the horcrux.
See, it all makes sense. That Halloween night at Godric's Hollow, with both Lily's and James's deaths swirling around, Voldie goes in for the final kill (baby!Harry). He raises his wand, magic at the ready... but the magic is pushed back and Voldemort destroyed.
The wand was the only thing between Voldemort and Harry.
We've seen only inanimate objects as horcruxes (the diary, Gaunt's ring) and it would make sense to think that the thing must be inanimate. (It being risky to turn a living object into a horcrux, as per Dumbledore). So, yeah.
What do you think?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 12:06 am (UTC)*ahem*
Okay, I'm done now.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 12:14 am (UTC)Interesting to think it might be the wand though.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 12:15 am (UTC)"Give my mortal enemy his wand so I have one final chance to exact my revenge!"
"Um, boss, we've already got him tied up and helpless."
"Silence! He has no chance of escaping ME! Give him back his one hope at escape!"
"I know! I'll have a child, who has never indicated any real animosity toward mudbloods or muggles outside of some juvenile whining, and have him construct an elaborate plot to get my minions into Hogwarts! None of the dozens of crafty adults at my service could do better!"
And so on.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 12:16 am (UTC)Still, I like my wand theory. I think i'm on crack, but it's fun to theorize.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 12:50 am (UTC)personally, i think that is much more brilliant, but not so likely in jkr's world. the nagini theory seems pretty common though.
but i wonder, voldemort ak's harry and looses his corporeal form, right? so where did his wand go? into the ether with him? it must have, i suppose, or else it would have clattered to the floor of the nursery and been found.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 01:17 am (UTC)"I think I know what the sixth Horcrux is. I wonder what you will say when I confess that I have been curious for a while about the behaviour of the snake, Nagini?"
"The snake?" Harry said, startled. "You can use animals as Horcruxes?"
"Well, it is inadvisable to do so," said Dumbledore, "because to confide a part of your soul to something that can think and move for itself is obviously a very risky business. ...
Of course it's fun to theorise, and Dumbledore may be incorrect! :D
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:02 am (UTC)*dies*
Another thing that made me believe it couldn't be Nagini: What happens to your chunk o' soul if that living creature dies? (Which leads back to the Horcrux!Harry theory).
Yeah, Peter was around and scammed Voldie's wand. What a rat.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:07 am (UTC)And let's not even go into that whole prophecy thing in book 5, shall we?
Although, a proper villian for a kid's book does need to be a bit of a stumblebum. After all, the protagonist is a teenage boy, and while teenage boys can be smart, they are still teenage boys. When was the last time a teenage boy took over the world? (Alexander the Great excepted)
Heh
Date: 2006-01-10 02:08 am (UTC)However personally, its gonna be a copy of play witch that's under voldies mattress. Yep. Even evil wizards need lovin :p.
*looks at sentence and pokes out eyes repeatedly.*
Harry can't be a horcrux... He's too feckin dumb. You'd think something with TWO souls, the essence of two people, the mind of someone, would be a bit smarter tho.
That would explain the voldie dumb theory:
Give him his wand.
Boss, you split yourself into seven pieces. SEVEN. Let some one else do the thinking.
Yah.
What if the final horcruz was Dumbledores glasses? Drake swiped em before he left? Or it could be severus' hair... its greasy and evil enough.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:08 am (UTC)Blasphemy!!1!
Personally, I think Nagini is an Animagus. But that's just me.
Re: Heh
Date: 2006-01-10 02:13 am (UTC)What was it that Xander said in that episode when Buffy and Spike start smooching under a spell? "Can I be blind too?"
Boss, you split yourself into seven pieces. SEVEN. Let some one else do the thinking.
But is it seven or eight? Are there seven Horcruxes, with the eighth piece in Voldie's head, or are there six + Voldie? I have no idea. But now I'm rambling.
Now I need to find that curry!Horcrux story...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:15 am (UTC)-Sonya
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:22 am (UTC)Still, I like my wand theory. I think i'm on crack, but it's fun to theorize.
I like the wand theory as well as a like the Harry-Horcrux theory (though stealthyshade has a point that Harry'd presumably be a bit smarter with a chunk of Voldie in him) and better than I like the scar-Horcrux theory. You do seem to be on the giddy side this evening. Cheers!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:24 am (UTC)i personally think it's a great idea, but if i went all criminally insane and megolomanical, i don't think i'd name my followers death eaters, either. i mean, c'mon. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:33 am (UTC)Re: Heh
Date: 2006-01-10 02:49 am (UTC)I don't know, thats what I was wondering. In the fic you recced Death to the Bone, it said harry had gotten 6 Horcruxes... and wasn't the point of the mysticality that there were 7 parts to a soul, not eight. So therefore, fuck the horcrux, pop a cap in voldie and he's dead.
*looks up* wow I'm geeky :p.
But yeah, I'm pretty sure that its just 6 horcruxes and voldie.
What did they have? the ring, the medalion... I'm calling they are:
A spellbook: Rowena Ravenclaw
A plant: Helga Hufflepuff
The sword?: Godric Gryffindor
The Locket: Was slytherins I think.
Nagini
The ring.
Voldies pasty white arse
Or Not
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 02:50 am (UTC)I swear, if I'm ever evil...I'm going to be smart about it!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 03:08 am (UTC)That's why they turn to crime: It's not that they're superior beings all around, it's that even the bright ones always want to cut moral corners all the time; they simply can't function under normal rules, so they don't bother to try.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 03:31 am (UTC)Speaking of Evil masterminds
Date: 2006-01-10 03:38 am (UTC)http://www.planetadnd.com/humor/misc_humor/evil_overlord.php